Search for: "Samsung International, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 2:49 am
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc: [2012] EWCA Civ 729; [2012] WLR (D) 166 “Where the proprietor of a registered Community design, the validity of which was already in issue in proceedings before the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) or another Community design court, brought a counterclaim alleging infringement of the design against a claimant who had issued a claim in a Community design court… [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 11:51 am
[JURIST] Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:34 pm
Apple Inc. filed a U.S. trade complaint that seeks to block imports of Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:40 am
International Trade Commission administrative law judge made an initial finding on Wednesday that Samsung Electronics Co. infringed four Apple inc. patents for smartphone and tablet technology. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:44 pm
Apple, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:44 pm
Apple, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:53 am
International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:07 pm
The defendant is an international joint venture of Toshiba Corporation and Samsung Electronics Co.Ltd., The plaintiff owns the U.S patents given below: U.S Patent No. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:18 pm
International Trade Commission [USITC] said on Dec. 16 it would investigate a complaint brought by Kodak against Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. relating to importation of goods violating claims of Kodak patents in the area of mobile phones with digital cameras.PC World noted: At the same time that it filed the ITC complaint, Kodak also filed a lawsuit against the companies in the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 10:35 am
As expected, Samsung appealed the Delhi High Court order endorsing the concept of "international exhaustion" under the Indian Trademarks Act. [read post]
Apple filing reveals Samsung recently reduced its 2.4% royalty demand for standard-essential patents
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am
Complaint, Ericsson Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
It told the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it had "conferred with Appellee International Trade Commission and Intervenor Apple Inc., and neither party object[ed] to the requested voluntary dismissal. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:26 am
s Motion for SanctionsSeptember 3, 2013:Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for Sanctions and Request that this Motion be Assigned to the Administrative Law JudgeSeptember 6, 2013:Respondent Apple Inc.' [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:00 pm
Lexmark International, Inc. opposes. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 am
Zuru, Inc., 513 F. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:15 am
An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at the International Trade Commission (ITC) recently determined that Samsung Phones violate key patents on magnetic emulator technology for contactless payment systems from Pittsburgh’s Dynamics, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:52 pm
In the Order, ALJ Gildea denied Respondents Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
The claimants in the case, Samsung (UK) and Samsung (Korea) were seeking, against the defendant, Apple Inc. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:15 am
An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at the International Trade Commission (ITC) recently determined that Samsung Phones violate key patents on magnetic emulator technology for contactless payment systems from Pittsburgh’s Dynamics, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Apple Inc. [read post]
